An economics lens for early-stage B2B SaaS
Early-stage product bets feel binary: either ship the feature/vertical or don’t. Real options flip that logic.
In finance, an option is the right—but not the obligation—to invest later when uncertainty resolves. Apply that to product strategy and you get a roadmap that learns fast, preserves upside, and limits downside.
Economists have been refining this for decades: Dixit & Pindyck formalized investment under uncertainty; Kester and Luehrman translated the math for managers; Trigeorgis mapped the option types (defer, stage, expand, contract, abandon, switch). We’ll pull those ideas into a founder-friendly playbook you can use this quarter.
The 60-second primer (enough to be dangerous)
- Irreversibility matters. If a decision is hard to undo, the option value of waiting is real. You should pay attention to learning before committing.
- Uncertainty can be an asset if you have flexibility. Options are worth more when uncertainty is high and you can pivot/abandon.
- Strategy = portfolio of options. Don’t pick one big bet; assemble small, staged bets you can expand or kill.
- Managers already do this intuitively. Real options just give names and discipline to the moves: defer, stage, expand, contract, abandon, switch.
Translate the theory to SaaS decisions
Option type → SaaS move
- Defer / Wait: Hold a feature/vertical until you clear a regulatory change or get a lighthouse customer.
- Stage: Run a discovery sprint → pilot → general availability, with funding released only at gates. (This is discovery-driven planning in action.)
- Expand: If pilots hit activation & TTV goals, scale to the full segment.
- Contract / Pause: Narrow scope or limit GA to a subset while you fix activation.
- Abandon: Sunset the effort and redeploy capacity if gates fail (a put option on your roadmap).
- Switch: Repoint tech or GTM (e.g., move from direct to partner-led) when evidence says so.
Deploying Real Options in SaaS
You don’t have to build the feature fully before validating it—that’s throwing away your option value. Case in point: firms work with discovery sprints, generating mini‑products or prototypes in just weeks to test demand before coding extensively.
Another real‑world process: when feature scope balloons mid‑sprint or signals shift, many teams call “rescope” or “freeze” on the fly. That’s not failure—it’s staged option discipline in action.
Even in non‑SaaS ventures, the math holds true: a Spanish agritech co‑op assigned option value to delaying deployment until adoption signals improved—all without losing the right to scale later.
These are not academic—but practical, economic plays:
The Real-Options Playbook (you can start this week)
1) Create an Options Backlog
Every “maybe” initiative gets an Option Card instead of a full PRD:
- Thesis: What would need to be true for this to be big?
- Cheapest learning step: Discovery interview set, mock, data spike, or lighthouse pilot.
- Triggers & expiry: What evidence unlocks the next stage? When does this option expire?
- Pre-mortem risk: What would make us kill this?
- Owner & stakeholders: Who runs it; who must sign the gate?
This keeps bets small, reversible, and legible—core principles in real options and discovery-driven planning.
2) Fund with an Option Budget
Set aside a fixed slice of capacity (design/PM/eng) each quarter for options. Treat it like a fund: many small tickets, a few follow-ons, ruthless cuts. Luehrman’s framing—strategy as a portfolio of options—is your north star.
3) Install Staged Validation Gates (release funding only if passed)
Borrowing from McGrath & MacMillan’s discovery-driven approach, define 3–4 gates up front:
- Gate 0 (Discovery): Problem validation + willingness-to-pay signals from 5–10 targets.
Kill if: No real pain, no economic buyer. - Gate 1 (Prototype/Pilot): Hit time-to-value under 48 hours with a lighthouse customer; 1–2 “aha” moments measured.
Kill if: Activation < target; integration blocked; ROI unclear. - Gate 2 (Repeatability): 3–5 customers complete pilot; pilot→contract ≥ target; support load acceptable.
Kill if: Conversion/retention economics don’t beat status quo. - Gate 3 (Scale): Expand pricing/packaging, build enablement, expand infra.
These kill criteria operationalize the right but not obligation principle—your default is don’t scale unless evidence forces your hand.
4) Use option-aware metrics
Classical DCF misses flexibility. At minimum, track:
- q-ratio intuition (Luehrman): Is the “value-to-cost” rising across gates? If q isn’t trending up, stop.
- Probability-of-Scale: % of options graduating each gate. Portfolio health > one hero bet.
- Downside absorbed: Hours/$ burned on killed options vs. capacity preserved for the winners. (Kester’s original question: trade off immediate ROI vs. growth options.)
5) Architect for optionality
Real options are more valuable when you can pivot cheaply. Concretely:
- Modularity & feature flags so you can test with small cohorts (stage, expand, abandon at low cost).
- Interfaces first (APIs/webhooks) to switch GTM or data sources if a vertical misfires.
- Pricing guardrails (good-better-best) so you can move upmarket if the option pays.
These moves increase “flexibility,” the core driver of option value.
A 30-day example (apply tomorrow)
You’re considering a RegTech vertical.
- Week 0 (Gate 0): 8 buyer calls validate pain; 3 agree to lighthouse pilots if TTV < 48h.
- Week 1–2 (Gate 1): Data spike + “Concierge” setup; two pilots hit activation in <36h; third stalls due to SSO.
- Week 3–4 (Gate 2): 2 of 3 pilots show weekly usage + quantified time saved; both sign paid pilots with credit-back clause.
- Decision: Proceed to Gate 3 with enablement + pricing; kill SSO work until repeatability improves.
That’s a call option exercised—evidence unlocked scaling. If the pilots had fizzled, you would have let the option expire and preserved capital.
Pitfalls (and how the economics warns you)
- Big-bang builds. Ignores irreversibility; you destroy the option to wait/learn. (Dixit & Pindyck.)
- Over-stuffed gates. If kill criteria aren’t explicit, you’ll never kill—your portfolio turns into sunk-cost theater. (Discovery-driven planning.)
- Valuing options in isolation. Options interact; the next option is worth less if you already hold many similar ones. (Trigeorgis.)
TL;DR for founders
- Treat features/verticals as options, not commitments.
- Stage funding behind learning gates with explicit kill criteria.
- Portfolio > hero bet. Keep many small calls alive; double down only when the signal is loud.
If you want a one-pager Option Card template or help designing your gates, ping me at angkan.mukherjee@gmail.com—happy to share drafts and examples.
further reading
- Dixit, A. & Pindyck, R. Investment Under Uncertainty (Princeton, 1994). https://msuweb.montclair.edu/~lebelp/DixitPindyck1994.pdf /
- Kester, W. Today’s Options for Tomorrow’s Growth (HBR, 1984). https://hbr.org/1984/03/todays-options-for-tomorrows-growth / store page: https://hbsp.harvard.edu/product/84208-PDF-ENG Harvard Business ReviewHarvard Business Publishing
- Luehrman, T. Investment Opportunities as Real Options (HBR, 1998). PDF: https://siliconflatirons.org/documents/initiatives/IRLEdayfour/Luehrman_Investment_Opportunities.pdf / HBR store: https://hbsp.harvard.edu/product/98404-PDF-ENG Silicon FlatironsHarvard Business Publishing
- Luehrman, T. Strategy as a Portfolio of Real Options (HBR, 1998). PDF: https://hpirotte.ulb.be/INGESTcovalfi/readings%202014/2b%20-%20HBR%20Luehrman%20%281998%29%20-%20Strategy%20as%20a%20Portfolio%20of%20Real%20Options%20%28NW%29.pdf / HBR store: https://store.hbr.org/product/strategy-as-a-portfolio-of-real-options/98506 hpirotte.ulb.beHarvard Business Review Store
- Trigeorgis, L. Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation (MIT Press, 1996). MIT Press page: https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262201025/real-options/ / Google Books: https://books.google.com/books/about/Real_Options.html?id=Z8o20TmBiLcC MIT PressGoogle Books
- Trigeorgis & Reuer. Real Options Theory in Strategic Management (2017 review). PDF: https://giesbusiness.illinois.edu/josephm/BA549_Fall%202018/Session%207/Trigeorgis%20and%20Reuer%20%282017%29.pdf Gies College of Business
- Trigeorgis (1993). Nature of Option Interactions (JFQA). JSTOR: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2331148 / abstract: https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v28y1993i01p1-20_00.html JSTORIDEAS/RePEc
- Kulatilaka & Trigeorgis (1994). General Flexibility to Switch. SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5567 SSRN
- McGrath & MacMillan. Discovery-Driven Planning (HBR, 1995). HBR page: https://hbr.org/1995/07/discovery-driven-planning / PDF copy: https://mengwong.com/school/HarvardBusinessReview/Discovery%20Driven%20Planning.pdf Harvard Business ReviewMeng Wong
- Discovery Sprints in Agile SaaS – Thoughtbot https://thoughtbot.com/services/discovery-sprint
- Discovery Sprints as a Lean Option – DevSquad https://devsquad.com/blog/discovery-sprints
- Adapting to Change with Real Options in Agile Startup Management – FasterCapital https://fastercapital.com/content/Real-Options-Analysis–ROA—Adapting-to-Change–Real-Options-Analysis-in-Agile-Startup-Management.html
- Rescope or Freeze Features When Signals Shift – Thinslices https://www.thinslices.com/insights/deciding-what-not-to-build-and-when-to-rescope-or-freeze
- Innovation ROI & Real Options Applied Beyond SaaS (AgriTech example) – StartUs Insights https://www.startus-insights.com/innovators-guide/innovation-roi-guide/
- Case Study: Discovery Sprint Prototypes (Master’s Thesis, LUT University) – Robert Kivirinta https://lutpub.lut.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/161068/Pro_Gradu_Robert_Kivirinta.pdf?sequence=1